cerec bluecam scanner acquisition image capture

Conclusions: The Lava COS in combination with a high accuracy scanning protocol resulted in the smallest and most consistent errors of all three scanners tested when considering mean distance errors in full arch impressions both in absolute values and in consistency for both measured distances. The distance errors for the Cerec were the largest and least consistent. Results: The distance errors were the smallest and most consistent for the Lava COS. These values were compared to the measurements made on a high accuracy 3D scan of the master model. In software the digital files were imported and the distance between the centres of the cylinders and the angulation between the cylinders was assessed. Materials and methods: A master model made of stone was fitted with three high precision manufactured PEEK cylinders and scanned with three intra-oral scanners: the CEREC (Sirona), the iTero (Cadent) and the Lava COS (3M). In this study the accuracy of three intra-oral scanners was compared.

This feature makes it easy to distinguish between gingiva and the preparation margin, and between gold, amalgam, and composite restorations.Intra-oral scanners will play a central role in digital dentistry in the near future. Generating a digital model in color, with natural shades, is another feature the Omnicam possesses that the Bluecam does not.

This is called the Patient Counseling Mode, and is designed to improve case acceptance. This process can be interrupted and resumed at any time.īetween the Bluecam and Omnicam, only the Omnicam allows the operator to record video clips of the scan so they can be shown to patients. Thanks to its continuous image capturing, the Omnicam's camera can be moved closely over the teeth in a natural, flowing movement.

The Bluecam's single-image capture method requires the camera to be placed directly on the tooth.

The Omnicam, on the other hand, uses continuous image capturing to generate a 3D model.Īs a result, the Bluecam is better suited for single-tooth restorations, while the Omnicam excels at full-arch and half-arch scans. The Bluecam combines several single images to create a 3D model. The Bluecam does require powder, but only a thin layer. This adds considerably to its convenience factor. The Omnicam is the first CAD system from Sirona that doesn't require powder. This month we've broken down the main differences (and similarities) between Sirona's two latest CAD systems. Curious about how the CEREC Omnicam and CEREC Bluecam compare? You're in luck.

Cerec bluecam scanner acquisition image capture